Skip to main content

Social Skills Assessment

The Social Skills Assessment is a free 37-item self-report that measures your interpersonal strengths across six dimensions: Empathy, Active Listening, Assertiveness, Emotional Regulation, Social Awareness, and Boundary Setting. Six items per dimension, answered in 10–15 minutes on a 1–5 agreement scale, produce a 0–100 score per skill and highlight the areas most likely to move the needle in your relationships and work.

Sign in to get your analysis

Free account · first test free · no credit card

Questions
37 (6 per dimension + 1 attention check)
Time
10–15 min
Format
Likert agreement (1–5)
Output
0–100 score per skill + strengths and growth areas
Cost
Your first test is free with a free account, PDF export and sharing of your own results included. More tests and AI-written reports come with Premium.

Who this test is for

  • Professionals in people-facing roles — management, coaching, sales, counselling, teaching — who want a structured baseline for deliberate interpersonal development.
  • Anyone who has received feedback about their communication style but wants a more precise picture of which specific skill is the bottleneck.
  • Therapy and coaching clients working on relationship patterns who want a quantitative supplement to qualitative self-reflection.
  • Team leads running retrospectives who want to surface social skill gaps without putting individual scores on a wall.
  • Students and early-career professionals preparing for roles where emotional intelligence and interpersonal effectiveness are evaluated.
  • People who scored low on the Social Skills domain of the EQ test and want to drill into which of the six component skills is driving that result.

How the test is scored

The assessment draws on the social competence tradition in personality and applied psychology — particularly the multi-component view that social skill is not one trait but a cluster of separable, improvable abilities. Each of the six dimensions has its own six-item scale; scores are independent, so a high Empathy score does not automatically predict high Assertiveness.

Created by Peter Janicki, MSc Medical Psychology

The six dimensions

Empathy captures how readily you notice and share the emotional state of the people you interact with — the cognitive and affective components together. Active Listening measures focused, non-interruptive attention and reflective responding. Assertiveness covers clear, respectful expression of needs and limits without aggression or collapse. Emotional Regulation reflects how well you manage your own emotional state during conflict or high-stakes conversations. Social Awareness is the ability to read group dynamics, unspoken norms, and shifts in social context. Boundary Setting measures your capacity to establish and hold healthy limits without guilt or erosion.

Reference: Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 649–660.

Self-report and its ceiling

Self-reported social skill tends to agree only moderately with how other people rate the same person, and the gap is often largest on Empathy and Social Awareness, where people tend to see themselves more favourably than others do. The report flags answer patterns that make a sitting hard to read — rushing, or giving nearly the same answer throughout — but no self-report can detect self-flattery. If you intend to use results for development planning, supplementing them with feedback from trusted colleagues or a coach is recommended.

Skills, not traits

Social skills are among the more trainable psychological constructs. Unlike personality traits — which tend to be stable across decades — skill-level competence responds to deliberate practice on timescales of weeks to months. The practical implication: your lowest-scoring dimension is not a fixed ceiling; it is the area where structured practice is most likely to produce a measurable change. The report focuses on specific, concrete behaviours linked to each dimension rather than generic advice.

Why all six matter together

The six dimensions interact in practice. High Empathy paired with low Assertiveness often produces a pattern of understanding everyone but advocating for no one — including yourself. High Assertiveness with low Emotional Regulation can come across as aggression rather than confidence. Reading your six scores side by side shows which of these combinations apply to you; the report names your strengths and growth areas and gives a practice for each skill.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between social skills and emotional intelligence?

Emotional intelligence (EQ) is the broader construct — it includes self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, and social skill as one of its five domains. This assessment drills into that social-skill domain at higher resolution by separating it into six component abilities. EQ tells you the overall shape; this assessment tells you which specific interpersonal skill is carrying the load and which is lagging. If your EQ assessment showed Social Skills as your lowest domain, taking this assessment is the natural next step.

Can social skills actually be improved?

Yes — and the evidence is unusually clear on this compared to other psychological constructs. Deliberate practice with feedback produces meaningful gains in assertiveness, active listening, and emotional regulation over months. The typical failure mode is practicing the wrong thing in the wrong way: reading about assertiveness doesn't move it much; rehearsing specific phrasing in low-stakes situations does. The development plans in the report are built around that distinction.

I scored high on Empathy but low on Assertiveness. What does that mean?

This is a common profile — and it tends to produce a specific kind of relational strain: you understand others well, often anticipate their needs before they ask, but have difficulty expressing your own needs clearly without feeling guilty. The result is invisible emotional work, resentment that builds slowly, and relationships where other people rarely have to stretch toward you. The practice the report suggests for Assertiveness is a good place to start — it builds assertive expression without asking you to give up the empathic attunement.

How does Boundary Setting differ from Assertiveness?

Assertiveness is about expressing your perspective, needs, and opinions in the moment — saying what you think clearly and respectfully. Boundary Setting is about establishing and maintaining limits over time — what you will and won't accept structurally in a relationship or situation. You can be highly assertive in a single conversation but still struggle to hold a boundary over weeks. They correlate but are genuinely distinct: a person who speaks up readily (high Assertiveness) can still let relationships gradually erode their limits (low Boundary Setting).

What does a low Social Awareness score mean in practice?

Social Awareness measures how readily you pick up shifts in group dynamics, unspoken norms, and changes in others' states — the 'reading the room' skill. A low score typically shows up as missed social cues, misreading how a conversation is landing, or being surprised by social fallout that others saw coming. It is one of the dimensions most affected by social anxiety (which narrows attentional focus inward) and also by simple unfamiliarity with a social context. The practices for this dimension focus on deliberate outward attention during conversations.

My Emotional Regulation score is low. Should I be worried?

Not worried — but it is worth taking seriously. Low Emotional Regulation in this context means you find it harder to stay regulated during conflict, disagreement, or high-stakes conversations — which makes it more likely that your emotional state rather than your considered response drives the outcome in moments that matter. It is one of the most improvable dimensions with practice, and it is often the root cause behind scores that seem like Assertiveness or Listening problems. A trigger-pause-respond practice tends to move it faster than most.

Is this test the same as the EQ social skills domain?

It overlaps with the Social Skills domain of EQ assessments that follow Goleman's model, but it operates at higher resolution. Where EQ measures one social-skill composite, this assessment separates six distinct component skills and scores them independently. Taking both gives you the full picture: EQ tells you how the social skill domain sits relative to your other four EQ domains; this assessment tells you which specific component of social skill to work on first.

How often should I retake this assessment?

Every three to six months during active development is the most useful cadence. Retaking too frequently (within weeks) without meaningful practice in between is unlikely to produce a measurable change and can be discouraging. Retaking after a significant change — a new role, a deliberate practice period, a coaching engagement — gives you a meaningful before/after comparison. Each retake shows how every skill moved since the last one, so you can see which skills are responding to practice.

What your report looks like

Your report shows a 0–100 score for each of the six dimensions, the skills that stand out as strengths or growth areas, and a specific practice for each skill.

Six-dimension scorecard

Bars from 0 to 100 for Empathy, Active Listening, Assertiveness, Emotional Regulation, Social Awareness, and Boundary Setting — each showing how strongly you agreed with that skill’s six statements, with a one-line interpretation. These are not percentiles: the form does not yet have enough completed sittings for a comparison with other people.

Primary strength and growth edge

Skills that sit clearly above or below the middle of the scale are named as strengths or growth areas. When your scores are too close together to separate, none is singled out and the report says so.

Response-quality notes

If your answers look rushed or nearly identical throughout, the report says so rather than reading more into them than they can support.

Development practices

A specific practice for each skill, matched to its level — concrete actions, not generic advice.

We use essential cookies to keep you signed in and optional analytics cookies to improve the product. See our Privacy Policy.